home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 1994 13:01:37 -0400 (EDT)
- From: Timothy Miller <millert@undergrad.csee.usf.edu>
- Subject: Re: Proposal
- To: gem-list@world.std.com
- In-Reply-To: <9406011145.AA06312=avg@mijt.cwi.nl>
- Message-Id: <Pine.3.87.9406011337.G2199-0100000@undergrad>
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
-
- On Wed, 1 Jun 1994, Annius Groenink wrote:
-
- >
- > > Agreed, I think we do need some standard here too. Maybe we should
- > > suggest that the minimizer is only for non-modal dialogs, and that
- > > dialogs never have the fuller and scroll-bar. I really dislike some
- > > programs that were written with 640*480 in mind, that give me scrollbars
- > > to move through the dialog on my 640*400 screen. Maybe it would be a
- > > good recommendation to limit dialogs to 320 pixels in the vertical
- > > direction.
- >
- > 38 columns times 22 rows should generally be kept as a maximum. Otherwise,
- > split the dialog into smaller ones.
- >
- >
- How about a terminal program where you want, say, 75 character macros to
- be entered into your document?
-
-
-
-
-
- Hey, if we're going to be developing standards, why don't we develop a
- standard set of escape sequences similar to ANSI or vt-52 with the same
- capabilities, but with less data overhead. And how about a graphics
- standard for sending graphics over the modem? I know many exist, but
- let's make a better one! :)
-
-
-